The second heating cycle followed immediately from the first,
and without interruption to the vacuum, by restoring the
sample's temperature to 400
C. The reflection profiles
appeared identical in both shape and intensity to those
observed at the same temperatures during the first cycle.
The high degree of reproducibility is a further indication of
the stability of the sample alignment throughout the experiment.
The temperature was next raised to 450
C and was then
maintained at this temperature without interruption for close
to 21 days; measurements were collected continuously
throughout the period. Thus eliminating changes of a wholly
temperature dependent nature from the measurements, and
allowing for the study of the time evolution of processes
associated solely with the vacuum annealing. The potential
processes of interest being oxygen diffusion out of the sample,
and decomposition of the sample into separate constituent
phases. The upper limit for operating the furnace was around
470
C, and so 450
C was chosen for the measurements
as the maximum temperature which could be reliably maintained.
An unfortunate loss of x-ray intensity, due to a blown filament in
the rotating anode source, occurred after approximately 120
hours of annealing and is responsible for the gap in the data
up to 300 hours, and also for the anneal time being extended
beyond what had been first intended.
A sequence of profiles in Figure 4.6 show the
evolution of the (0 0 20) fundamental reflection over the entire
period of this annealing at 450
C. A very strong reduction
in intensity occurred, which was similarly observed in all
other reflections, the (0 0 20) having halved in peak
intensity by 438 hours of annealing. The full width at half
maximum (FWHM), surprisingly, also decreased. This is
opposed to the strong broadening which was observed
at temperatures up to 400
C during the first cycle of the
experiment. This suggests that the previous multiplicity
of crystallites caused by the annealing at 300
C to 400
C
have now, in part, re-merged together due perhaps to the
re-establishment of a more homogeneous oxygen distribution
within the sample at this higher temperature. The halving
in intensity is too large to be attributable to any possible
change in the structure factor, and is of course, not
due to any Debye-Waller effect because of the constant
temperature. It is most likely caused by the decomposition
of some of the sample into an amorphous state which
therefore no longer contributes to the Bragg diffraction,
in particular the surface decomposition is a commonly
reported feature of annealed samples [113,114,115].
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The changes in the satellite reflections over this period
are illustrated in Figure 4.8 by the four first order
satellites from around the (0 0 26) fundamental position; it can be
seen that the second order reflections are already extremely
weak. Intensity reductions of a similar order to those for the
fundamental reflections of Figure 4.6 are seen. Although
still broad, the FWHM values have also reduced in accord
with the reduction of the fundamental reflections. And, unlike the
asymmetrical changes seen during the first cycle in Figure
4.2, a perceptible shift in the centre position of the
satellites is now apparent. The measurable change in peak
position is very small, and the reflection shapes make it too
uncertain to determine beyond stating that the
value has reduced to approximately 0.20. But the redistribution
of intensity from the outer side of the satellites to the inner,
axis, side is quite distinct, and most importantly,
the changes are observed symmetrically about the
axis.
The nature of this redistribution of scattering away from the
previously unperturbed 0.21
satellite positions
becomes further evident if the scattering which lies between
adjacent satellite positions across the
axis is examined
in detail. Two such scans, taken after
440 hours of
annealing, along the [0 1 0] direction are shown in Figure 4.9,
one crosses the
axis at ( 0 0 19) and one at (0 0 21).
The change is dramatic, a new and very prominent reflection line
has appeared inside the -0.2
satellites. It is, in fact,
so strong as to be almost equal in intensity to the satellite
of the (0 0 21) scan, whilst for the (0 0 19) it is roughly
half. The new reflections correspond to a position of
approximately -0.14
. These new reflections could
potentially be satellite reflections with a shortened
value, and correspondingly relate to the formation
of a new longer period modulation within the structure due
to the removal of excess oxygens. However, if this is indeed
the case, it is to be expected that accompanying satellites
should also be found at the
positions.
To aid the interpretation of the multiplicity of lesser
features, a matching scan is included for reference in Figure
4.9 across the (0 0 20) fundamental position. From
this scan it is possible to attribute features in the satellite
profiles to their features of origin, displaced by 0.2
,
in the mosaic of the fundamental profile. All the features in
the satellite profiles should, after all, be identifiable in
this way as the satellites of secondary crystallites, except,
if they exist, the q=0.14
satellites. It can
be seen, for example, that the strong reflection in the very
centre of the two satellite reflections, marked
in the figure,
originates from a quite prominent secondary reflection
in the fundamental profile. In this way, the asymmetry and
splitting of the primary fundamental reflection is reflected
clearly in the shape of its satellites, with large tails to the
left, and several prominent steps in these tails which match up
between the profiles. In contrast, the right side of the
fundamental reflection is quite clean from any such features,
and this means that a clean shape should also be expected to the
right side of the satellites. This can be seen to be the case for the
+
satellites, but for the -
satellites it is in
just this position that the strong new reflections are observed, at -0.14
.
Now, looking at the more involved left side of the reflections, an
additional feature is distinguishable in the tail of the +
satellites, which does not have any equivalent feature in either
the fundamental profile or in the
satellites. Although
this feature is weaker than that at -0.14
, and is less
distinct due to the large tail which stretches through the position,
it is located close to +0.14
. It is found, therefore,
that there exist no corresponding secondary crystallites in the
fundamental profile to which the features at
could be
attributed.
![]() |
Further evidence in support of interpreting these new features
as being due to longer period modulations comes from the
response upon cooling. No further
development in any of the observations was observed beyond
438 hours up to the end of the annealing at 504 hours, suggesting
an equilibrium had already been reached before these measurements.
After this, the sample was returned to room temperature. Upon
cooling, all satellite reflections, both those from the primary
and secondary crystallites, were observed to increase strongly
and in unison. The only exception was the reflections at
which showed little or no change, and so
in relative terms decreased in intensity. This further suggests that
they cannot be described as satellites of a secondary crystallite.
![]() |
The behaviour of the diffuse streaks was also studied during
this extended period, Figure 4.10 shows the streak
at (0 -0.21 26) measured in both [0 1 0] and [0 0 1] directions.
The interpretation of the behaviour is complicated by the mosaic of
the fundamental reflection which extends through this position, and
which varies over a greater range in intensity than the streak itself.
This can be seen best in the [0 1 0] scans where the fundamental
mosaic is seen as a sloping background upon which the streak
is superimposed; the reduction in this mosaic which has already
been discussed can be seen in the change from the profile at 120
C
with a very strong background to the lowest profile at the end
of annealing at 450
C. The effect of the mosaic is to exaggerate
the height of the streak in the [0 0 1] scans. So, while a significant
intensity appears still to remain at the end of annealing in Figure
4.10(a), a measurement from the [0 1 0] profile shows the
intensity of the peak to be entirely accounted for by the mosaic
background. Similar results from other positions suggest that the
streaks have indeed disappeared by this point of the experiment.
The same result has also been claimed by Bdikin [92].
Unfortunately, the quality of the data is not adequate to be able
to conclude whether this is the result of a true transition or whether
it is merely a consequence of the greatly reduced intensities which
have effected satellite, fundamental, and streaks equally. It is however
notable that the [0 1 0] scans indicate for certain that the
widths of the diffuse streaks are consistently increasing during a
period when the widths of satellites and the fundamental
reflections were both observed to sharpen. This would support
the interpretation that the behaviour of the streaks is distinguished
from that of the other reflections and that they undergo a order-disorder
transition at temperatures above 400
C.